01.12.2010 - 08:38
The game is moving, and fast. I applaud the devs. However, I also think it is a good idea to be able to evaluate rules setting thouroughly. I therefore suggest that certain parameters, such as city income increase rate, or say a tweak in unit cost, be exposed as game creation parameters (tweak a numeric value, select a checkbox, choose from a dropdown) instead of having global impact on everything. Because while some may hate a rule change for the impact it has on say tank commander agression, it may be fun to have this rule active sometimes, sometimes not. And it would make the development / change cycle a bit more manageable for the devs, and give more power to the users.
duke u karikuar...
duke u karikuar...
|
|
01.12.2010 - 10:31
Speaking of my own opinion, I would prefer to keep the game creation options rather simple - as it is, I feel there are already too many tabs, switches and checkboxes. Players don't bother with most of them anyway - and if we add more, it would make game creation a real chore. Amok has the opposite opinion - so we'll probably go for the middle ground
duke u karikuar...
duke u karikuar...
|
|
01.12.2010 - 14:13
=o The ONLY option I don't change is the 'allow alliances'. I change everything else depending on the type of game I wanna play.
duke u karikuar...
duke u karikuar...
|
|
04.12.2010 - 15:23
I love the options. Adds more perspective to the game, while you can still fire up a game quickly without changing much to the default settings.
duke u karikuar...
duke u karikuar...
|
A je i sigurt?