Serious question

Eshkruar nga Red.Army, 27.08.2019 at 09:57

Why do some people think being a faggot is so cool and trendy? Dick does not go with dick but dick goes with vagina

You saying this.... The Irony.

Eshkruar nga Red.Army, 27.08.2019 at 11:10

Eshkruar nga JUGERS2, 27.08.2019 at 10:28

Eshkruar nga Red.Army, 27.08.2019 at 09:57

Why do some people think being a faggot is so cool and trendy? Dick does not go with dick but dick goes with vagina

You saying this.... The Irony.

I know you are a faggot and you don't feel comfortable with being in the minority so you portray others as fags. Still a bit sour after what I did to you?

Your ruined multiple times for not only me but 17 other people our ww2 what you expect?

Yeah true, saying "Faggot" shouldn't be allowed.

Eshkruar nga Augustus Caesar, 27.08.2019 at 15:14

Is this kind of behaviour allowed? Sid attempted to perma ban me for calling him a faggot once. Then this guy can use it in every sentence? What a joke.

Are you sure that's all you did.

Stop being so sensitive. He is talking about this fagots:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mikoyan-Gurevich_MiG-15
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/9K111_Fagot

Eshkruar nga Augustus Caesar, 27.08.2019 at 15:14

Is this kind of behaviour allowed? Sid attempted to perma ban me for calling him a faggot once. Then this guy can use it in every sentence? What a joke.

There were a string of reasons sid banned you, furthermore i support his ban, youre a troublemaker.
Anyway if every little thing got reported to mods when would it end?

Eshkruar nga 4nic, 28.08.2019 at 17:13

So you like that he got banned but, then question when will we stop the banning for saying things?
Or not?

Meh, words shouldnt be punishable. Meaning behind words should be tho. Me calling Waffel a faggot and this guy trolling/spouting homophobic shit shouldnt have the same punishment.
Thats why we have mods, to determine stuff like that i guess..

Eshkruar nga Steve Aoki, 28.08.2019 at 21:56

Meh, words shouldnt be punishable. Meaning behind words should be tho. Me calling Waffel a faggot and this guy trolling/spouting homophobic shit shouldnt have the same punishment.
Thats why we have mods, to determine stuff like that i guess..

Shut up, faggot

Why do people think its trendy to cocksuck the worst failed state of all time (USSR) and its army?

Eshkruar nga Franz, 29.08.2019 at 13:44

Why do people think its trendy to cocksuck the worst failed state of all time (USSR) and its army?

Because Austria is too feminine to consider?

Eshkruar nga Skanderbeg, 29.08.2019 at 14:16

Eshkruar nga Franz, 29.08.2019 at 13:44

Why do people think its trendy to cocksuck the worst failed state of all time (USSR) and its army?

Because Austria is too feminine to consider?

Thats the only thing you have to target, my country of origin? Try to refute the central point of my statement.

Oh wait I just saw you are a communist larper.

Eshkruar nga Franz, 29.08.2019 at 14:58

Thats the only thing you have to target, my country of origin? Try to refute the central point of my statement.

Oh wait I just saw you are a communist larper.

Your central point of statement is that country that industrialized/modernized in 10 years, had 100% literacy rate and full employment, free healthcare and education, sent first man to space, had strongest land army, almost to no crime, second largest economy, is a failed state?

Only a feminine Alpengerman would say such thing.

Eshkruar nga Skanderbeg, 29.08.2019 at 15:31

Oh boy, here we go...

Eshkruar nga DeepFriedUnicorn, 29.08.2019 at 15:37

Eshkruar nga Skanderbeg, 29.08.2019 at 15:31

Oh boy, here we go...

He asked didn't he? Don't make the question if you don't expect the answer (or if you can't handle the truth)

Eshkruar nga Skanderbeg, 29.08.2019 at 15:31

Eshkruar nga Franz, 29.08.2019 at 14:58

Thats the only thing you have to target, my country of origin? Try to refute the central point of my statement.

Oh wait I just saw you are a communist larper.

Your central point of statement is that country that industrialized/modernized in 10 years, had 100% literacy rate and full employment, free healthcare and education, sent first man to space, had strongest land army, almost to no crime, second largest economy, is a failed state?

Only a feminine Alpengerman would say such thing.

He asked didn't he? Don't make the question if you don't expect the answer (or if you can't handle the truth)

First of all I will admit that the Soviet Union did a good job in terms of education, employment and social services, however that does not mean quality of life. And yes, I will admit that I perhaps went too far calling it the most failed state in history.

However, it did have serious economical problems at the end, and do I really have to remind you of how many died of famine and genocides under Soviet Rule?

Eshkruar nga Franz, 29.08.2019 at 16:31

First of all I will admit that the Soviet Union did a good job in terms of education, employment and social services, however that does not mean quality of life. And yes, I will admit that I perhaps went too far calling it the most failed state in history.

However, it did have serious economical problems at the end, and do I really have to remind you of how many died of famine and genocides under Soviet Rule?

It does improve quality of life: Russia didn't had many hospitals and modern medicine, USSR fixed this. Russia didn't had many schools, USSR did. Only 10% of Russian population lived in the cities, 60-70% in the Soviet Union. During 30s, Soviets had longer life expectancy than Americans for example(source: wikipedia).

This is how Stalin ensured population support. Maybe it was just humane thing to do, maybe just political stunt. It is fun to think about it.

Yes, USSR experienced economic problems at the end, that is a fact. Problem was not extreme, but not easy either, let's say medium, but Nationalism is what destroyed the country, not economy, everyone wishing to be the king of his village, no matter how small and insignificant it is. Economic problems were created due to companies being owned by the State, which couldn't fire or punish workers, this is fundamental flaw in Communism.

There is no concensus how many people died of famine(s) without adding political bias. Probably between 500,000-3 million, because more of that would be shown in the annual demographics (minus should be visible).

Genocide means killing one ethnic group in their native location, USSR didn't do that, German Reich did and openly talked about it during speeches. Soviet enemy was the class, not people, therefore political killings, not genocide.

Numbers vary from 20 million to 40 million to 100 million, which is a joke. People would rebel against such policy and win their freedom. But they didn't, because not many were killed (still more than in capitalist countries), between 500,000-5 million. Simply it is not possible to kill 40 million people in a country with 160 million and still end up with 290 million people 50 years later... having 5 million abortions each year.
Did Soviets had 15 children per family so that's how they replaced the dead and doubled the population? No, Communists promoted modern families, with 1-2 children. Population growth was natural.

Just like any historical nation: Soviet Union was very extreme in beginning, killing everyone who oppose it, then becoming softer each year. For example during Invasion of Czechoslovakia in 1968, Moscow protesters were just arrested, not killed. All until Gorbachev Era, when everyone could do and talk whatever they want without repercusion, police and KGB didn't care anymore. Even fascists created their parties at this time.

All this is just history, without politics. Soviet Union is painted dark by the United States due to Cold War. You have to paint your enemy evil so you can have excuse to fight him. Especially when you fight him for decades and people might wonder why so long. For example i just watched London has fallen movie and even there they had to mention Russia in negative light (british minister telling Russians ain't coming and no one cares). That creates negatives opinion about your enemy in peoples minds, and after a long time this becomes natural to people, they accept it.

Rome did this to Carthage, Greece to Persia, Saracens to Crusaders, it is not first time, and won't be the last.

P.S.
'larping' as stalin because heard name hitler is not allowed, triggers people. good times.

Eshkruar nga Skanderbeg, 29.08.2019 at 17:04

Economic problems were created due to companies being owned by the State, which couldn't fire or punish workers, this is fundamental flaw in Communism.

I'm sure you're aware if companies were private they could fire Wokers. Taking you said it's a "Fundamental flaw" to have them government owned?
So you're a capitalist, a Socialist? Or more of a mixed economist? You can't be communist.

Eshkruar nga Augustus Caesar, 29.08.2019 at 22:54

Eshkruar nga Franz, 29.08.2019 at 16:31

The problem I've found is that people who don't live in former soviet republic's or have no relatives who had, are the ones who are most vocal about the failure of the Soviet union where as you see videos of people who lived during those times say how much it was better and so on. For people who are actually interested in the lives of these people who were affected by the collapse then I massively suggest watching a youtuber called "Bald and Bankrupt" he is an englishmen who mixes with locals so well and gives huuuuge insight into lives in these places. channel link here https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCxDZs_ltFFvn0FDHT6kmoXA/videos

Yes I have seen his videos. They are good.

Eshkruar nga Red.Army, 30.08.2019 at 07:53

Eshkruar nga Franz, 30.08.2019 at 06:28

Eshkruar nga Augustus Caesar, 29.08.2019 at 22:54

Eshkruar nga Franz, 29.08.2019 at 16:31

The problem I've found is that people who don't live in former soviet republic's or have no relatives who had, are the ones who are most vocal about the failure of the Soviet union where as you see videos of people who lived during those times say how much it was better and so on. For people who are actually interested in the lives of these people who were affected by the collapse then I massively suggest watching a youtuber called "Bald and Bankrupt" he is an englishmen who mixes with locals so well and gives huuuuge insight into lives in these places. channel link here https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCxDZs_ltFFvn0FDHT6kmoXA/videos

Yes I have seen his videos. They are good.

Bruv so I'm in Austria and I've been asking people what they think of Soviet Union, they all said they were grateful for the Soviet Red Army Liberating Vienna from the Evil Nazis

Lol im sure most Austrians are grateful for the liberation but still no buddy. Vienna suffered the same fate as Berlin and many other German and Austrian cities, looting, pillaging and raping by the red army which it is infamous for.

Eshkruar nga Franz, 30.08.2019 at 09:29

Lol im sure most Austrians are grateful for the liberation but still no buddy. Vienna suffered the same fate as Berlin and many other German and Austrian cities, looting, pillaging and raping by the red army which it is infamous for.

You think Wehrmacht and Grande Armee were honorable and better? They didn't destroy and rape in Russia & Soviet Union, but spread rainbow? I'm pretty sure Wehrmacht is infamous in Moscow and Volgograd today, for raping and looting.

Red Army indeed commited idiotic crimes during Liberation of Europe, i am just saying not as much Western Propaganda portrait it. Last time i checked, 10,000 Red Army soldiers are imprisoned or executed for rapes for example. Double that number for non-reported crimes and that's the statistic, no words about 2 million. Thank Halder for Cold War propaganda, for me, he is greater propagandist than Goebbels.

US harass civilians and women in Baltic during NATO excercise and free time from bases, urinating around the cities like some occupators. They've killed family dogs in Serbia (kosovo region) after the war, going from house to house like nazis 70 years ago. So tell me one polite army.

Eshkruar nga DeepFriedUnicorn, 29.08.2019 at 17:24

I'm sure you're aware if companies were private they could fire Wokers. Taking you said it's a "Fundamental flaw" to have them government owned?
So you're a capitalist, a Socialist? Or more of a mixed economist? You can't be communist.

Neither. I'm just the guy talking history with people. I get good fun if i see history triggers them and that's it.

I couldn't care less for ideologies, wars and children on the internet except through Historical perspective.

Eshkruar nga Skanderbeg, 30.08.2019 at 12:13

Eshkruar nga DeepFriedUnicorn, 29.08.2019 at 17:24

So yes, a mixed economist

Eshkruar nga DeepFriedUnicorn, 30.08.2019 at 12:47

So yes, a mixed economist

I've been reading what 'ideology' is closest to my opinion, and it's probably German 'Ordoliberalism' [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ordoliberalism] Means the State must help the economy to achieve full pontential (if something can be produced/built in the country, then it should).

Norwegian style is also close to my views: the State must ban or tariff foreign import IF Norway can produce or built same thing locally. Meaning Norway imports only stuff they can't produce themselves.

But i still support nationalization/collectivization of agriculture and industry during the war. For easier spam of food and guns. Land and companies must be returned to owners after the war.