08.10.2014 - 05:53
<3 wish i was croatian with thiz englizh
duke u karikuar...
duke u karikuar...
|
|
08.10.2014 - 09:42
referring to your part of the aw package comment ofc it doesnt but what are we going to/can we do about it? I don't rewall and i actively discourage others from doing so because it generally causes complaints. Its just not worth it. However i do not condemn others who do since ive no legitimate means to do so. I do laugh though at people like goblin who vehemently trash rewalling but accept team rewalling and double layer walls etc. It is a hairsplitting difference. Even though i disagree with the logic/etiquette bonker applied i have to accept it since once again i havent a legitimate complaint, even you just said how nice of w4r it was not to hit paris. I don't consider that nice i consider that basic and common courtesy, just like saying "sorry" if you bump into someone on the street. The rest of your post basically sums up the one thing the aw community agrees on(bar maybe zizou).
you supported w4rs lies then after you yourself were revealed as a liar you came to this thread with some comment about how "lao always has to be right" in an attempt to discredit me. You made some vague attempt at being indirect with "But again, opinions! (Not bashing you lao, just dropping a post in)". I find this laughable, its the equivalent of calling someone a dick and saying "just my opinion tho no offense!!"
goblin ive had a bad few days recently, i havent been my usual self, but you did annoy me hopping into one of my games the other day to call my walling bullshit and ask if i was afraid. I didnt undermine your game, i actually paraphrased words from your own mouth. You undermined my game and that of my clan, i defended myself. You reap what you sow.
----
duke u karikuar...
duke u karikuar...
|
|
08.10.2014 - 10:26
My initial inclination was to refrain from comment due to the experiences of past attempts to have logical discussions with the creator of this thread. However this is a community matter so I guess it should not hurt to at least try . I would first of all like to note that the author requests clarification, this does NOT mean agreement. Members of the community were invited to share. It seems that most reasonable persons are in agreement that the enemy's unit should not be in France. Bonker later presents a very plausible argument that Uk has a right to contest 'Benelux', which in some instances may have the same effect as the situation in question . I see no reason to disagree with this. A big wall with no inner wall is NOT the same as a big wall with an inner wall. I think this should be obvious, intention to wall next turn is NOT a wall. I think Desu more or less covers this. Now moving to deliberately wb hamburg or any other city t1 and attack on t2 is a totally different story. I could say more but I think I will just end here for now.
---- "When you connect to the silence within you, that is when you can make sense of the disturbance going on around you." ― Stephen Richards
duke u karikuar...
duke u karikuar...
|
|
08.10.2014 - 10:43
how are they not the same.....
duke u karikuar...
duke u karikuar...
|
|
08.10.2014 - 10:43
you supported w4rs lies then after you yourself were revealed as a liar you came to this thread with some comment about how "lao always has to be right" in an attempt to discredit me. You made some vague attempt at being indirect with "But again, opinions! (Not bashing you lao, just dropping a post in)". I find this laughable, its the equivalent of calling someone a dick and saying "just my opinion tho no offense!!" What lies, the unit is clearly in Belgium
duke u karikuar...
duke u karikuar...
|
|
08.10.2014 - 10:51
i apologize ...if anyone knows how that feels like, its me. it annoys me to see players of your skills and smarts, using rewalls to gain an advantage you dont need.
duke u karikuar...
duke u karikuar...
|
|
08.10.2014 - 10:53
your dislike of illyria usually influences your attempts at logic... as we have seen in previous posts, most recently notably skends tournament thread. I really dont understand why people are feeling the need to distinguish between intention to wall and the actual existence turn 1 of an inner wall. If i had made the inner wall turn 1 and he had broken it turn 2 then the outerwall would still have been ignored and that etiquette still breached. It is a conditional situation that has no real relevance... except perhaps as desu stated it was nice of paris not to cap me, well at least in his opinion, as silent so kindly pointed out we dont have to agree. Personally if there is any attempt at a cap wall i wont hit it turn 2, even if failed, to me that is also a common courtesy on aw... its not something i personally would commend someone for not doing...
----
duke u karikuar...
duke u karikuar...
|
|
08.10.2014 - 10:54
clearly in Belgium?
duke u karikuar...
duke u karikuar...
|
|
08.10.2014 - 10:54
This discussion is stupid, desu has already resolved the situation: W4r did put his unit in france, but lao's wall is considered a capital wall, therefore W4r had the right to wf paris.
duke u karikuar...
duke u karikuar...
|
|
08.10.2014 - 10:58
Yes? The unit isn't described by the actual circle, but rather the center of the circle. This is made clear when you make your move. It follows a path. you are showing a zoomed out image, to make the impression to others that the unit circle was crossing more into France then it really was Simple logic tells you, the center of the circle is the exact positioning of the unit. Follow the border of belgium, and boom. there it is
duke u karikuar...
duke u karikuar...
|
|
08.10.2014 - 11:04
your unit is in france. stop trying to justify your cunt move and accept you are wrong.
duke u karikuar...
duke u karikuar...
|
|
08.10.2014 - 11:04
----
duke u karikuar...
duke u karikuar...
|
|
08.10.2014 - 11:07
Why accept I'm wrong? I just gave you concrete evidence of me being correct! Hah! I messaged Ivan/Amok, we will see if my justification is correct to them.
duke u karikuar...
duke u karikuar...
|
|
08.10.2014 - 11:09
concrete evidence ? are you blind mate the unit is clearly more in france than in belgium, everyone can see that so you're just making a fool out of yourself at this stage.
duke u karikuar...
duke u karikuar...
|
|
08.10.2014 - 11:15
Guys this is getting no where... One side says it was in and the wall shoudve been considered there ( which it should of if there was a cap wall) and the other says the unit is in belguim and the wf is ok (which it isnt). This is turning into a matter of how each person interprets the picture and giving opinions trying to convince other opinions... Just give it a rest.
---- We are not the same - I am a Martian. We are not the same - I am a... divided constellation?
duke u karikuar...
duke u karikuar...
|
|
08.10.2014 - 11:15
You aren't even following the Belgian border..
duke u karikuar...
duke u karikuar...
|
|
08.10.2014 - 11:17
this is whai yo are my boy <3
duke u karikuar...
duke u karikuar...
|
|
08.10.2014 - 11:18
lol ikr, i didnt even address that argument, it is splitting hairs taken to an extreme. nice gif khal btw.
----
duke u karikuar...
duke u karikuar...
|
|
duke u karikuar...
duke u karikuar...
|
|
08.10.2014 - 11:19
I love you <3 and nice signature u have!
duke u karikuar...
duke u karikuar...
|
|
duke u karikuar...
duke u karikuar...
|
|
08.10.2014 - 11:35
duke u karikuar...
duke u karikuar...
|
|
08.10.2014 - 11:35
thats the thing though, i do feel i need this advantage, i remember testing an if uk rush with syrian, turn 4 he dropped 55 units onto my cap, something like a dozen if tanks in the mix, they cut through my 45 pd units like they were made of paper. Try as france expanding normally and getting 40 units back into pars turn 3, easy enough right? now bear in mind that uk can rush madrid turn 1, in a teamgame turk can rush rome, going full madrid and trying to defend is harder, especially if a clever uk knows how to place units and walls to prevent you getting back. france is a high risk country vs uk, it is disadvantaged by many factors. the other country in europe i would employ a double wall on is turk vs ukraine. ukraine is a very dangerous country, it has huge versatlity in strat choice and expansion possibilites, good ukraines are very difficult to beat if you dont expand normally, and if you fear a ukraine balkans rush you may not do this. i've encountered and used 1v1 pd ukraines that cap london turn 3 whilst getting 40 units back to kiev for 4 to pressure ankara and dissuade any rush attempts. the double wall on my cap gives me room to expand and deal with these kind of plays. You guys say these walls are unfair, but i disagree. If theyre used against you you should respond appropriately, you no longer have the psychological advantage of a turn 3 rush. bear in mind, if theyre using such walls monitor their troop stack positioning. chances are they tend to overexpand, you can do the same and hardly defend your cap. It's part of this strategey game and you need to take all this into consideration.
----
duke u karikuar...
duke u karikuar...
|
|
08.10.2014 - 11:47
----
duke u karikuar...
duke u karikuar...
|
|
08.10.2014 - 12:16
So is germany vs ukraine and various other examples ...why is france any different? But i dont even agree that France has that much of disadvantage like germany has with Ukraine ...yes UK IF is tough on France, but its not bullet proof. On the other hand, Paris rewalling gives France a much much bigger advantage then UK might initialy had. Turkey and Ukraine ...when i remember how i use to put 100+ units in Gomel and still have enough in ankara i'l get back to this.
duke u karikuar...
duke u karikuar...
|
|
08.10.2014 - 12:37
france isnt different, you can double wall as germ vs ukraine, but thats less units expanding... and ukraine may rush your expansion... i wouldnt double wall in that situation. but yea uk isnt bullet proof, but i feel like this is a pointless debate, because there is so much uk and france can do in their first few turns that can decide the battle, a double wall isnt even that significant in the battle, and apparently double wall attempts are useless as france, since people can open the outerwall turn 1 citing belgiums proximity as an excuse. but i feel this is a battle of opinions, when i end up in a uk vs france game i think great ive an advantage here. and more often than not i win double wall or not. uks port locations are just so useful for surprise attacks. and fun fact, with the new strat changes if uk can reach berlin turn 1 with gen, and vice versa. as for turk vs ukraine, turk can only get 100 units into gomel after turn 5, assuming turk maintained its territory. the huge unit prod of turk is its power. but good ukraine players will attempt to shut down turks expansion and reduce its territory. ofc theres always the rush option, but if you can play a very good ukr youll match and surpass turk for unit count. Turk needs that double wall, trust me. ukr doesnt, ukr has to bring units down to its frontlines turn 3 and 4 to pressure turk anyway, whether theyre shoved into kiev or not makes no difference. Not to mention if you donate 11 units to a wall turn 1 youll inhibit ukraines expansion significantly.
----
duke u karikuar...
duke u karikuar...
|
|
08.10.2014 - 13:32
Please move away from 'where' the unit is, as I showed you it is actually somewhat irrelevant as there are other ways the wall could be broken. The actual discussion is on if, in the situation the wall is down, is it then appropriate to keep the wall down / attack. Half the thread is in deciding if the unit is on French lands baha
duke u karikuar...
duke u karikuar...
|
|
MacAttack! Llogaria u fshi |
08.10.2014 - 16:50 MacAttack! Llogaria u fshi
Even if the image was not zoomed out the center of your unit would've still been inside France because most of the unit shown in the image was inside France. So it's true if the image wasn't zoomed in the unit portion in France and Belgium would both decrease at the same rate. i.e.) This image would result: And even assuming the center of your unit was in fact in Belgium using the "center of the unit wasn't technically inside" argument, then these would also technically be deemd legal during 3v3's or CW's: ....etc. Now I'm not saying you did it on purpose but clearly the fact is your unit was within France territory. I'm also not trying to crucify you or degrade you in anyway, as sometimes it does accidentally happen, but from a completely neutral/unbiased perspective the unit was inside France.
duke u karikuar...
duke u karikuar...
|
08.10.2014 - 16:57
<3
----
duke u karikuar...
duke u karikuar...
|
|
08.10.2014 - 17:19
War, please don't involve the admins this discussion. It's kind of embarassing...
---- The church is near, but the road is icy... the bar is far away, but I will walk carefully...
duke u karikuar...
duke u karikuar...
|
A je i sigurt?