Difference between MoS and GW

What is the difference between MoS and GW. I think GW is a derived form of MoS. Because with MoS you pay 110 for marines and get advantage only with stealth dumb bombers and 1 increased capacity for subs. But in GW, your militia is faster and powerful and also marines are only 80. MoS name itself hold marine but in it marines cost 110

Gw is good for small maps(especially) which you dont have more monies and you dont need long ranges.
Mos is also good for big maps which you can carry your marines with submarines. But Gw is cheaper than Mos. Just try both and realize the differences.

I tried both and hard to find any difference

So, tell me which maps do you play mostly ?

If your answer is small maps like europe and starting fund is 5k/10k then play with GW. It will allow you to save your money. And you will be able to make milita spam.

But if you play big maps, you can try Mos. It is hard stratagy to use for new players. You should try it lots of time.

I play world maps during leisure time in holidays and europe in a hurry

I've played both game types with GW.

The main difference is just the feel. GW offers campaigns that can be sparked from little to nothing. You could conquer enemy-held USA from Western Europe with nothing more than 21 marines. Similarly, MoS does the same. Except MoS is a much more hungry beast to feed, and you don't just pick up more and more useful units- you have to pay through the nose for offense and defense.

Generally, it's the money. GW is low cost. MoS is high cost. Keep in mind however, MoS seems much more mobile than GW and infantry are not downgraded w/ MoS.